Saturday, October 24, 2009

Obama Declares State Of Emergency: Martial Law Will Be Next

Back in April, I predicted that Obama would use the swine flu as an excuse to declare Martial Law. As with all of my predictions of Obama, it looks like this one too will come true. For 6 months, this administration has been shoving a disease that isn't as potent as seasonal flu down our throats. Basically, they have been creating the fear that is causing people to run to clinics when it hasn't been needed, so that the healthcare system can become "strained" as an excuse to declare an emergency. Declaring an Emergency is the first step in declaring martial law. When Obama does declare martial law, it will not be titled as such. He will have some very eloquent or soothing word to usher in his full blown dictatorship. While this emergency is declared, he is currently working on other fronts to fight his war by censoring media. As I stated back in April, the real focus of this disease is not about its lethality. Quite the contrary. The less lethal but communicable the better. It is about power. I predict also that once his power is in place, the only swine in existence will be Obama

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

You're just another one of those conspirators that has been on Obama's ass since before he became the democratic nominee. I bet you think, in addition to wanting to be a dictator, that he's a commy, a socialist, that he wasn't born in this country, and that he's a terrorist. It isn't about power, it never has been. And it never will be. Because, if it were, you would also call into question Massachusetts' loyalty to the union. This is because Massachusetts' Governor actually has more power than any other governor of any state, so much so that it is quite frightening. Oh, and they are also in the process of declaring a Health Emergency, so watch out! Those crazy Northeastern people might come to your house and burn you at the stake for being a witch!

jrchaard said...

I don't think he is a terrorist, just that his policies ar terrorizing. And he is a dictator and not a commy, but a fascist, and I do not believe he has provided sufficient proof to show that he was born in this country. And it wouldn't surprise me that a state like Massachusettes has a top heavy government.

Anonymous said...

Nothing is ever good enough is it? Politicians will never do everything they say, nor will ever be perfect due to the fact that they have to try and please everyone which is impossible.

I don't think you could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a dictator. Do you even know the definition?

You may not like him - and each to their own - but you sound like an ignorant southern redneck cock who can't stand someone with skin darker than a off-shade of white. Which isn't to say you are, but the conspiracy theory you've barfed up sure makes you sound so.

jrchaard said...

I don't know if you have seen the title of my blog or some of the other posts, but as with all ill attempts at debate, you insist that the only reason I find flaw in Obama's policies is because of the color of his skin. In order for you to be logically sound, a simple if then statement, you would have to say that if obama's policies were enacted by a caucasian, then I would be in favor of them. Similarly, if my opposition to a person is based solely on their skin, when I offered similar criticism of Bush then I must also dislike caucasians. So, please disprove my statement. Please look through my blog and find where you can see that race is the driving motive behind my criticism. Until then, I conclude the debate with a resounding victory over an elitist.

Anonymous said...

This is a great article as they all are. I from been wondering nearly this looking for some beat now. Its vast to get this info. You are objective and balanced.

jrchaard said...

thank you.

Anonymous said...

The information here is great. I will invite my friends here.

Thanks

Anonymous said...

Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now. Keep it up!
And according to this article, I totally agree with your opinion, but only this time! :)

Anonymous said...

You have to express more your opinion to attract more readers, because just a video or plain text without any personal approach is not that valuable. But it is just form my point of view

The Urban Farming Lady said...

So what is your reason for saying he is a dictator. And what is your definition of dictator?

jrchaard said...

I define him as a dictator in that he has no regard for the rule of law and separation of powers. For example, unilaterally granting amnesty. Unilaterally choosing not to enforce the defense of marriage act. Declaring the senate in recess(senate power only) to make a recess appointment to the NLRB... A dictator also uses intimidation, such as that which he has exerted over the supreme court. They also use their agencies to oppress the people, such as EPA and coal.